Amendments to PECA Law Raise Concerns Over ‘Civilian Martial Law’

79
Amendments to PECA Law Raise Concerns Over 'Civilian Martial Law'
Amendments to PECA Law Raise Concerns Over 'Civilian Martial Law'
Advertisement

The passage of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (PECA) Amendment Bill 2025 has triggered strong criticism from journalists and opposition parties, with senior journalist condemning it as an authoritarian move that threatens press freedom.

“Silencing the press goes against democratic principles. These actions are pushing us toward civilian martial law,” Abbas stated during a news program.

Also Read: Omar Ayub Alleges Ex-Army Chief Bajwa Supported Negotiations with TTP

The amendments, swiftly approved by both the National Assembly and Senate, are intended to curb misinformation and fake news on social media, according to government officials.

However, Abbas argued that the law closely mirrors similar attempts made by previous administrations. He pointed out that the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government first introduced PECA in 2016, followed by a stricter version under Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). Now, he claims, the current government has introduced the “worst version yet.”

“They are banning your thoughts. You cannot even think [freely], otherwise, it can be interpreted speaking against someone,” the journalist warned. 

Abbas went on to say that the successive governments first censored writing, then images, and now speech. “In reality, they are trying to kill or massacre the media,” he added.

Addressing the government’s justification for the amendments, questioned the definition of fake news.

“They claim they want to regulate misinformation on digital media. But what is fake news? If I say today that the February 8 election was rigged, does that make it fake news? No, it is an opinion — something that can be debated,” he explained.

The journalist cautioned against rushing legislations, calling such actions dangerous. He questioned the urgency behind the amendments, pointing out that governments often find themselves opposing the very laws they once enforced.

Advertisement

“Why the rush?” he asked. “This government, once out of power, will be the first to suffer under this law.” 

He also warned that if the opposition were to come into power, it could impose even stricter measures. “The next government, if formed by the current opposition, could be worse,” he remarked.

Abbas accused the government of falsely claiming it had consulted stakeholders before introducing the Peca amendments.

“They are lying. When the PTI government was in power, they held consultations. When PML-N was in power, Marriyum Aurangzeb herself admitted she was unaware that such a law was being introduced,” he recalled.

However, he appreciated the senior Punjab minister for taking action against relevant officials.

Abbas criticised the prevailing mindset that seeks to control the media, stating that “true consultations involve an exchange of drafts, not just claims.”

He called on Federal Information Minister Ataullah Tarar to disclose the drafts purportedly shared with journalist organisations if the government had truly engaged in multiple rounds of discussions.

‘Govt not in a rush’

Meanwhile, Adviser to the Prime Minister on Law and Justice Aqeel Malik offered a differing perspective, arguing that the government was neither hasty nor rigid in its approach and that consultations had indeed taken place.

“This matter has been under discussion for the past three to four years. Even when Marriyum Aurangzeb was the information minister, consultations were held, and the government incorporated many suggestions,” Malik, a lawyer by profession, said during the same show. 

He noted that discussions had taken place during Senate committee sessions but emphasised that “not everything needs to be included in an act of parliament — some aspects should be left to the rules.”

Defending the government’s position, Barrister Malik cited international examples, pointing out that Australia has banned social media for children under 16 and that the United States has separate legislation on fake news for each state.

He also referenced the fake news surrounding the Southport killings in the United Kingdom, which led to further violence.

“Maintaining that this issue should not be addressed, I think is wrong. There is an element of intent in it. It is for all Pakistanis. The fraternity has not been targeted in it,” Malik concluded, stressing the need for legal measures to counter misinformation and disinformation.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here